From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 19:38:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B99C1065672 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:38:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19948FC26 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 19:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:2c91:fa66:2350:ddab] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:2c91:fa66:2350:ddab]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB3Jc0cC017332 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:38:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <4CF9470F.4020709@sentex.net> Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:37:51 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eugene Grosbein References: <201011270946271408828@yahoo.com.cn> <20101128081617.GA90332@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> <4CF73A2C.7000802@rdtc.ru> <4CF89EE7.8020807@rdtc.ru> <4CF93A77.30804@rdtc.ru> In-Reply-To: <4CF93A77.30804@rdtc.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12 Cc: freebsd-net Subject: Re: Problem with igb(4) updated to version 2.0.7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:38:03 -0000 On 12/3/2010 1:44 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 03.12.2010 23:49, Jack Vogel wrote: >> It has never been the case that 'down'ing an interface brings link down, >> not on em >> or igb. So this isn't problem with the release. >> >> Jack > > Now I see, thanks. > > Is it technically possible to bring link down > for distinct port of dual-port em/igb-supported NICs using software? > > If yes, I'd like to patch my source tree. > For EtherChannel this kind of management should be possible. If your switch port's speed and duplex are manual, change the media options on the NIC to something like 10 half. The switch should see the port "down" then. ---Mike > > Eugene Grosbein > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >