From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 2 14:46:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1661E106566B for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 14:46:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f226.google.com (mail-ew0-f226.google.com [209.85.219.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A78B8FC19 for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2010 14:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so11696450ewy.3 for ; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 06:46:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wGTU/5w7P8bN574eGHYvvGRntr8Q744DaE+PjuTZdFU=; b=tp2+ePd8fuIPDCdtJHDPH2wnDQpQS0OzIfkbZbWAr/McG0NiZ8NBD1g/xKwgL/QEu/ lxgiy4B0zohx685BTZNzJEuAaT6Up8/ey5D6a+gkKebmJDaVlGPwIhOtXEX0rAfD8noa cuzQlcDs5HtnC4A6DOC+j99HeJZua7Cn58+DQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CurWX95Zv9bLGCnRT006HkpQW5QvvuKCJiGFSyycaawzlYbKkXyL5OJF9u28Kr0DQo IIRVB9wOl4014olvgk9TWBN08DxH/0lD/Jt6rAjqg88L4OdoTkfXIecyMO5faHakSaUI mBWAUpRRg7uMZ69LzmaymthEZ/2q1ALOrm1yw= Received: by 10.216.91.5 with SMTP id g5mr7783070wef.168.1262443582237; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 06:46:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i6sm44457496gve.16.2010.01.02.06.46.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 02 Jan 2010 06:46:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 14:45:57 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100102144557.5ad217f7@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <4B3F46ED.7080100@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20100101231924.4df469df@gumby.homeunix.com> <35F4927C-D6EA-4C27-B9ED-3E07FFA5FD28@goldmark.org> <4B3F46ED.7080100@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.18.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: spamassassin Y2010 bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 14:46:27 -0000 On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:15:25 +0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > However, neither of these have been accepted by the > p5-Mail-SpamAssassin port maintainer. It's not really a one-size fits all problem - it depends on which channels you use and whether you want sa-compile (which isn't supported by either script quoted). sa-update is very cheap to run - if there's no update it's just a dns lookup. If you're using the auto-generated "sought" rules you may wish to update several times a day. OTOH sa-compile is very cpu intensive, and once a day may be too much. One other thing is that just I always use sa-update with --gpghomedir. If you use the default you loose any third-party public keys each time the SA port is reinstalled.