From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 12 14:50:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4C016A4DD for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:50:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9029443D46 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:50:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 79161 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jul 2006 14:50:09 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=POitKmmdnVVy6rPqQ3URQkW5Z2Qvp2ey5T/yPRTVqk7E532TU1xd1CTpvGX5pNjs+c0hx8QnxOGCDB/kHNVa7KVhmazrl6nInA5KVgQAGoGy5Ran99f0dlmiSpDH22oesErvZC4UD4w2njSibdhbclckQjAgCtT4AHdAouTgP6o= ; Message-ID: <20060712145009.79159.qmail@web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.118.70.231] by web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:50:09 CEST Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:50:09 +0200 (CEST) From: To: Mike Meyer In-Reply-To: <17589.1784.567790.215719@bhuda.mired.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:40:12 +0000 Cc: mag@intron.ac, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++ X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:50:10 -0000 --- Mike Meyer ha scritto: ... > > Windows is the de-facto standard OS: a lot of people know how to use > it. > Well... I wish several commercial CAD software producers thought otherwise. > We're bright enough to know that popularity doesn't imply technical > excellence, otherwise we wouldn't be on a FreeBSD list. Having avoided > that trap in the choice of platform, doesn't it behoove us to avoid it > elswhere? > Is someone still using SPIN/modula?? ;-). If it were easy to replace C++ with C + kobj() than I'd say... leave things as they are. But if it's not difficult to make some C++ modules work than we should be bright enough to evaluate the changes. I don't have any real opinion of the patches though, so I'll leave the matter here. cheers, Pedro. Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com