From owner-freebsd-net Wed Mar 8 9:11: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from meer.meer.net (meer.meer.net [140.174.164.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D86E37C1D7 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 09:10:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from jchurch.meer.net (unknown-35-202.wrs.com [147.11.35.202]) by meer.meer.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/meer) with ESMTP id JAA10158977 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 09:10:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from neville-neil.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jchurch.meer.net (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id JAA92779 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 09:15:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Message-Id: <200003081715.JAA92779@jchurch.meer.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Netgraph and the loopback? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 09:15:40 -0800 From: George Neville-Neil Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Folks, I'm just starting to play with Netgraph. Thanks to Archie for the great article BTW! I'm thinking of adding the loopback interface to the list of interfaces that come up automagically (like the Ethernets) with the kernel. Any reason I shouldn't do this? I want it so I can play with the system on a laptop that sometimes has no ethernet in it. Seems like a reasonable thing to do but... Thanks, George To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message