From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Jul 23 09:13:34 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEB937805A for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:13:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC67y0KZ6z4Jrt for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:13:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0B2D337811E; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF2B378059 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:13:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC67x6c6mz4JgJ for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:13:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C65DC16CA1 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:13:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06N9DX09015679 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:13:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 06N9DXvA015678 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:13:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 248172] if_tuntap(4): OpenVPN configuring tun/tap devices ends up with IFDISABLED interfaces Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:13:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: gert@greenie.muc.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kevans@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:13:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248172 --- Comment #14 from Gert Doering --- (In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #12) rc.conf settings can not be the correct answer for spurious and timing-dependent differences in behaviour. Also, I can not control what our users will do (and they might not have IPv= 6 on the LAN side, so might not have turned it on in rc.conf) - so I need a reli= able and robust way to bring up a tunnel interface with IPv6, independent of rc.= conf settings. Adding some argument to our ifconfig call (or adding some extra ioctl()s or whatever) is not a problem, but right now I need an extra "sleep(1)" before= the "ifconfig $dev inet6 -ifdisable", which looks race'y and probably is... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=