From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 21:31:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205E516A468 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:31:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofe-freebsd-embedded@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EFE713C44C for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:31:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofe-freebsd-embedded@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hzfqx-0001Rq-SL for freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:30:39 +0200 Received: from d463cd6f.datahighways.de ([212.99.205.111]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:30:39 +0200 Received: from ino-news by d463cd6f.datahighways.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:30:39 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org From: clemens fischer Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:07:26 +0200 Organization: more-or-less Lines: 43 Message-ID: References: <20070611214113.GC44552@tirith.brixandersen.dk> <200706120921.09263.freebsd-embedded@dino.sk> <20070612083825.GA56032@tirith.brixandersen.dk> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: d463cd6f.datahighways.de User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: JTAG recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:31:08 -0000 Henrik Brix Andersen in <20070612083825.GA56032@tirith.brixandersen.dk>: > That's not the issue here - I was asking what other people on FreeBSD > use for their JTAG needs, seeing that OpenOCD isn't in ports I doubt > that is in widespread use among FreeBSD users (else, someone would > have submitted a port). sorry, i don't have the time to wait for my post to appear on gmane. i wrote the original tiny little patch for openOCDs fbsd support, and i just checked the current SVN sources: they are still there, and they should work, although i only used bitbanging on the parallel port. note that openOCD is still very actively developed, you should definitely use the SVN repo. the only thing you might need is this: #!/bin/sh # bootstrap.fbsd aclocal19 && autoheader259 && automake19 --gnu --add-missing && autoconf259 because the linux versions don't carry version numbers in their names... i understand that USB is better specified than the parallel port. you might get away without patching anything, just using the correct "./configure ..." incantation for your FT* chip based interface. please report back with success/failure and what you had to do to get it to work. also, there's a wiki[1] where people collect configuration information, you can check there for your controller, and please update any missing pieces. last year the "edit page" link needed a login, and the creating an account wasn't automatic, you'd need to tell dominic to list you up. [1] http://openfacts.berlios.de/index-en.phtml?title=OpenOCD_configuration other than that, openOCD worked fairly well, it should work even better using USB. regards, clemens