From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 22:22:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53B91065670 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:22:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnorwick@centurytel.net) Received: from mail962c35.nsolutionszone.com (mail962c35.nsolutionszone.com [209.235.152.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5D58FC15 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:22:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Authenticated-User: mnorwick.centurytel.net Received: from blacky.norwickhouse.net (174-124-44-105.dyn.centurytel.net [174.124.44.105] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail962c35.nsolutionszone.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o9QMMpgS004144 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:22:52 GMT Message-ID: <4CC753A4.3080300@centurytel.net> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:18:12 -0500 From: "Michael D. Norwick" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101024 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=1.1 cv=RRJos3QI4lKrQ/rIRcKgRVKtptq/IQb+IRYTV0nB2JU= c=1 sm=1 a=bxJeATYsCPgA:10 a=wX1feKkJRjM7wEGjkGmfTw==:17 a=dynt39AsAAAA:8 a=s1O25tkdAAAA:8 a=b6WAp8xpXG40qOSIaMoA:9 a=10R9bAu8tM0ycOJaTjkA:7 a=fIPa4h9uQE-VfbDGRzX87QNcTfwA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=-9pRwNy2iCUA:10 a=Jw29t_AgHPoA:10 a=OyOq_G8mXAEA:10 a=kZP2qvmW5q4flHkPrzwA:9 a=z5v46Vzbsscc_ClMyWgA:7 a=dn02At1al7TU9uWyCusYil0W0EAA:4 a=wX1feKkJRjM7wEGjkGmfTw==:117 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Fwd: Re: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE Installation success X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:22:55 -0000 Oops; Originally sent this to the poster and not the list. Sorry. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE Installation success Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 06:27:56 -0500 From: Michael D. Norwick To: Warren Block On 10/25/10 21:52, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Michael D. Norwick wrote: >> I spoke a little too soon. I was UPGRADING to KDE4 4.5.2 as I was >> typing the message. 'portupgrade kde4' was @ approx. 38% when it >> error'd out on something about 'kdelibs4-4.4.5' too old. Going to >> /usr/ports/kdelibs4 and 'make clean', 'make', borked also. I do not >> have much time tonight for fiddling so, I deleted my ports tree and >> cvsup'd /usr/ports again. > > 1. Use csup, not cvsup. csup is in the base system. > 2. Consider using portsnap instead. > 3. Deleting your ports tree before updating it will waste time and > bandwidth. Use 'portsclean -C' if you just want to remove work > directories. > 4. http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/portupgrade.html > >> I have not looked at PC-BSD because I thought the BSD's were all >> somewhat similar (powerful, stable, and secure). > > PC-BSD is just a desktop installation of FreeBSD and KDE. Well, > there's a little more to it than that, but it *is* FreeBSD, not a > different BSD. > > Thank You, point taken. 'portupgrade kdelibs4' stopped a quarter of the way through on a fresh ports tree. The following is a sample of the errors: "/usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qlist.h:528: error: 'QT_TRY' was not declared in this scope /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qlist.h:528: error: expected `;' before '{' token /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qlist.h:530: error: expected primary-expression before '...' token /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qlist.h:530: error: there are no arguments to 'QT_CATCH' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'QT_CATCH' must be available /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qlist.h:530: error: expected `;' before '{' token /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qlist.h: In member function 'void QList::replace(int, const T&)': /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qlist.h:540: error: 'p' was not declared in this scope /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qlist.h:540: error: there are no arguments to 'Q_ASSERT_X' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'Q_ASSERT_X' must be available /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qlist.h:542: error: 'QTypeInfo' was not declared in this scope /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qlist.h:542: error: expected primary-expression before '>' token /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qlist.h:542: error: '::isLarge' has not been declared /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qlist.h:542: error: expected primary-expression before '>' token /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qlist.h:542: error: '::isStatic' has not been declared /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qlist.h: In member function 'void QList::swap(int, int)': /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qlist.h:553: error: 'p' was not declared in this scope /usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore/qlist.h:554: error: there are no arguments to 'Q_ASSERT_X' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'Q_ASSERT_X' must be available" I agree that removing /usr/ports when I have a major build issue is a waste of bandwidth if, the issue is not due to a tainted ports tree. I was just referencing an old(?) thread or howto that suggested it. This procedure had fixed another build issue with a graphviz dependency in the past so, I guess I took it to heart. I appreciate the responses and maybe I should be on PCBSD. I'm not running Apache2 or serving a couple hundred clients. I just wanted to run with the big dogs. Michael