Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:07:13 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Cc: Andreas Moeller <andreas-moeller@gmx.net> Subject: Re: fxp(4) device timeouts ACPI related? Message-ID: <200406070807.13562.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <40C0FEFB.8050605@gmx.net> References: <40BF38B4.6090208@gmx.net> <200406041521.34813.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <40C0FEFB.8050605@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 04 June 2004 07:00 pm, Andreas Moeller wrote: > >>>>The ACPI updates predating last weekend seem to have broken my fxp(4) > >>>>card (Intel PRO/100 S, Intel 82550 chip). Without disabling ACPI at the > >>>>loader prompt (set hint.acpi.0.disabled=1) I get the consecutive > >>>> message of the device timing out and network is unusable. > >>>> > >>>>Perhaps this is useful information for everybody desiring to workaround > >>>>the problem or even some developer to have a closer look at it. If a > >>>>more detailed description of my setup is needed, just let me know. > >>> > >>>Can you get before and after dmesg's and post a diff? > >> > >>Of course. diff is attached, the kernel is an unmodified GENERIC. > > > > Looks like !ACPI gives IRQ 11 to everyone and ACPI gives some devices IRQ > > 5 and some IRQ 11. Can you get a dmesg from the older kernel with ACPI > > enabled and generate a diff of that dmesg against the current kernel with > > ACPI? > > Attached. I had to get some older sources and build the kernel since I > didn't keep an old enough kernel around. The sources used date to May > 28th, 2:50am (UTC) and network works with ACPI enabled. > > I'm by no means an expert but I don't see any new insight revealed by > the diff between those two dmesgs. How about a dmesg from a boot -v with the new kernel? -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406070807.13562.jhb>