From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 7 15:11:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA05963 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 15:11:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA05850 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 15:11:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id VAA09186; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 21:08:56 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199810072008.VAA09186@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: How to send data between two network cards directly? To: andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de (Andre Albsmeier) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 21:08:56 +0100 (MET) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199810071959.VAA02775@internal> from "Andre Albsmeier" at Oct 7, 98 09:58:50 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > then for your purposes, UDP or raw ethernet packets are absolutely > > equivalent. > > I think I will stick with the raw packets first and see how it is > working. I still don't know exactly what I have to expect it's much more work than you need. You can use many readily available applications over udp (or icmp for what matters, e.g. you can just play with "ping" and run a tcpdump on the other side). cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message