From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 19:29:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40ED216A418 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:29:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jordi.espasa@opengea.org) Received: from mail.opengea.org (mail.opengea.org [85.48.253.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D3E13C4DB for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:29:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jordi.espasa@opengea.org) Received: from localhost (tartarus [127.0.0.1]) by mail.opengea.org (Opengea.org Project MailServer) with ESMTP id 94F74D50039 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:33:01 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at opengea.org Received: from mail.opengea.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.opengea.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id wUkrj3yzcVVO for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:33:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (78.Red-83-46-134.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.46.134.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jordi.espasa@opengea.org) by mail.opengea.org (Opengea.org Project MailServer) with ESMTP id 356C2D50033 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:33:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4794F29E.2060602@opengea.org> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:29:34 +0100 From: Jordi Espasa Clofent User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <47946AD3.2020601@opengea.org> <200801211226.51852.tim@priebe.alt.na> <47947587.2010106@opengea.org> <200801211253.48663.tim@priebe.alt.na> In-Reply-To: <200801211253.48663.tim@priebe.alt.na> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: denyhosts-like app for MySQLd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:29:36 -0000 > As far as I know you can run both. You can just have minimal rules in pf to > deal with this, and pass everything else, and deal with the rest in ipfw. I'm not a coder... but I think it shouldn't be a good idea. -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent