From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Apr 26 07:57:56 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA06462
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sun, 26 Apr 1998 07:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA06378;
          Sun, 26 Apr 1998 07:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 07:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199804261450.HAA06378@hub.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports
From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp>
Subject: Re: ports/6408: New jpeg port does not build if the old libs are around
Reply-To: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/6408; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp>
To: "Justin M. Seger" <jseger@freebsd.scds.com>
Cc: mi@aldan.algebra.com, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG,
        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ports/6408: New jpeg port does not build if the old libs are around
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 23:44:05 +0900

 Justin M. Seger wrote:
 > Could someone try to repeat this on STABLE?  It works fine on current.
 
   On my 2.2.6-STABLE box, I can build it with older libjpeg.  But I
 don't use gcc28.
 
   Is this gcc28 problem?
 
 
 -- 
 Jun Kuriyama // kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp
             // kuriyama@FreeBSD.ORG

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message