From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 02:50:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4AF16A4D0 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 02:50:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp [202.249.10.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E302043D69 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 02:50:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp) Received: from ocean.jinmei.org (unknown [3ffe:501:100f:1048:5c31:4b60:a406:2638]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13B915210; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:50:28 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:50:41 +0900 Message-ID: From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= To: "Konstantin KABASSANOV" In-Reply-To: <002601c4de18$02b64ea0$8748e384@ipv6.lip6.fr> References: <002601c4de18$02b64ea0$8748e384@ipv6.lip6.fr> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the correct ipv6 behavior for interfaces with gif tunnel on them X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 02:50:30 -0000 >>>>> On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:53:37 +0100, >>>>> "Konstantin KABASSANOV" said: >> Please provide more detailed network configuration. Are you talking >> about a router box forwarding packets onto gif and physical >> interfaces? > Well, this is a router box with 2 physical interfaces (say xl0 and rl0). > Rl0 has a gif tunnel (gif0) over it. Xl0,rl0 and gif0 announce in their > ifconfig an MTU of 1500, but 1300 bytes traffic generated from this box > and sent through the gif0 interface is fragmented by the rl0 interface to > 1280 bytes... > Please also specify the OS name (which I guess is >> FreeBSD) and its version. > FreeBSD 4.7 (yes it is a little bit old, but I think the problem still > persist in more recent versions)... And that's why I'm asking if this > behavior is normal or not... This is not the intended behavior, and seems to be fixed at least on FreeBSD 5.3. I don't know whether the change is merged into 4.x. At least it's not the case with FreeBSD 4.10. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp