From owner-freebsd-current Mon Nov 2 12:00:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA25562 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 12:00:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA25554 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 12:00:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA00963 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 11:59:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199811021959.LAA00963@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New boot loader and alternate kernels In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Nov 1998 20:54:24 +0100." <25007.910036464@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1998 11:59:57 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > >For on-disk usage, the key issue to me is avoiding anti-bloatist > >complaint (which have their fair justification). I'd like to think we > >can stabilise at an object under the 100k mark, although there are of > >course no real hard limits yet. > > Sigh, If Satoshi hadn't yanked tcl out, we could have used that... Nah; it was waaaay too big last time I looked, and again, no bytecode. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message