From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 16 01:29:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCFC16A41F for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 01:29:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D015D43D45 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 01:29:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE33D1A3C24; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:29:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 01CEB54A21; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:29:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:29:36 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Petr Murmak Message-ID: <20060116012936.GA28909@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060116012323.C88DCD3847@smtp.klfree.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060116012323.C88DCD3847@smtp.klfree.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount_nullfs dangerous? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 01:29:38 -0000 --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 02:22:05AM +0100, Petr Murmak wrote: > Hi! >=20 > I want to use mount_nullfs on FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE AMD64 to share part of > filesystem tree between different jails, but i found this in man pages for > mount_nullfs: >=20 > BUGS > THIS FILE SYSTEM TYPE IS NOT YET FULLY SUPPORTED (READ: IT DOESN'T > WORK) > AND USING IT MAY, IN FACT, DESTROY DATA ON YOUR SYSTEM. USE AT YOUR > OWN > RISK. BEWARE OF DOG. SLIPPERY WHEN WET. >=20 > Is this still valid? Because there is date May 1, 1995 underneath, so it = is > near 11 years old warning!? On 6.0 and above it is fine. Kris --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDyvb/Wry0BWjoQKURApXwAJ9JpZ/jgE0I0EaIbPMhYYDd4oHIbACgkkOU bETvzW+60Y/39ZuVv3xQbaw= =H2Cg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--