Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:19:08 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, Hooman Fazaeli <hoomanfazaeli@gmail.com>, Jason Wolfe <nitroboost@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Intel 82574L interface wedging - em7.3.2/8.2-STABLE Message-ID: <201203231419.08514.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4F6CBC59.2060601@sentex.net> References: <CAAAm0r3Qj%2B2rf8cx54bcyAXGQezcE8J=xXYPq4W-jDy75r8qew@mail.gmail.com> <201203201457.24776.jhb@freebsd.org> <4F6CBC59.2060601@sentex.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, March 23, 2012 2:09:29 pm Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 3/20/2012 2:57 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > >>> TX when link becomes active. I've also updated it to fix resume for em > >>> and igb to DTRT when buf_ring is used, and to not include old-style start > >>> routines at all when using multiq. It is at > >>> http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/e1000_txeof2.patch > >> Thank for the patch sirs, so far it does look like it did the trick. > >> I'll know for certain here in a few days if I'm still in the clear. > >> I'm guessing after it goes through some more testing it'll be too late > >> to slip it into 8.3? > > > > Yes, this is too late for 8.3, but thanks for testing! > > Hi, > Is there a RELENG_8 version of this patch ? I have a server that used to > shows this issue quite a bit, but has not since 7.3.2. I would be happy > to stress it on the box. The patch above does not apply cleanly due to > the netmap diffs, but I can manually merge if thats the only difference. I suspect netmap is the only difference. I have not yet tried to make a patch for 8.x. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201203231419.08514.jhb>