From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 22 15:48:55 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2F01065745;
	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:48:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B108FC0A;
	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:48:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id ED06A5622A; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:48:54 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:48:54 -0600
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Greg Larkin <glarkin@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20110222154854.GA18003@lonesome.com>
References: <201102220418.p1M4Idj6063729@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4D63B796.3080406@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D63B796.3080406@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/websh Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:48:55 -0000

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:18:14AM -0500, Greg Larkin wrote:
> Is it a good idea to decrement PORTREVISION after the previous commit
> has been in the tree for some number of hours?

Nope.  For instance, if a pointyhat run _had_ been started during that
window, the uploaded package would now be wrong.

mcl