From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 3 01:12:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA05589 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 01:12:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA05582 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 01:12:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA08273; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 01:01:21 -0800 (PST) To: Eivind Eklund cc: Amancio Hasty , Poul-Henning Kamp , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.0-RELEASE? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Mar 1998 09:39:23 +0100." <19980303093923.52803@follo.net> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 01:01:21 -0800 Message-ID: <8270.888915681@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I'm somewhat frightened at the versioning issue - is > clearly marked with 3.0 vs 2.2, and renaming would introduce > incompatibilities. This is more of Satoshi's area, though. Don't worry about it. The version is NOT going to change, period. It's going to be 3.0 no matter what the feature set is and I wonder why people are even wasting their time debating it because it's not even a subject which is open to debate. Hell will freeze over before I release a 2.5 or 2.3 or whatever you want to call it release, OK? :-) Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message