From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 05:22:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C2416A41F for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 05:22:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C8743D48 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 05:22:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9L5MtUg014783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:22:55 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9L5Mtia014782 for net@freebsd.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:22:55 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:22:55 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: net@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20051021052255.GV59364@cell.sick.ru> References: <20051020140200.GL59364@cell.sick.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051020140200.GL59364@cell.sick.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: Subject: Re: em(4) patch for test X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 05:22:58 -0000 On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 06:02:00PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: T> Colleagues, T> T> since the if_em problem was taken as a late showstopper for 6.0-RELEASE, T> I am asking you to help with testing of the fixes made in HEAD. T> T> Does your em(4) interface wedge for some time? T> Do you see a lot of errors in 'netstat -i' output? Does these errors T> increase not monotonously but they have peaks? T> T> If the answer is yes, then the attached patch is likely to fix your problem. T> If the answer is no, then you are still encouraged to help with testing T> and install the patch to check that no regressions are introduced. If you T> skip this, then you may encounter regressions after release, so you have T> been warned. T> T> So, in short: please test! Thanks in advance! T> T> The patch is against fresh RELENG_6. Christian has prepared a patch for RELENG_5: http://people.freebsd.org/~csjp/if_em.c.1129840898.diff This is the most important bit in all changes to em. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE