Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:33:29 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no> To: FreeBSD questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Solved. Re: Dualboot and ZFS Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1803231122360.66427@mail.fig.ol.no> In-Reply-To: <20180322015043.GA16501@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> References: <20180131082738.GA46395@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <547e65d16ef16667f61d88463ca73079@roundcube.fjl.org.uk> <20180319025914.GA57490@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <ec1e6976-3385-a66f-5938-ad09abae590f@fechner.net> <20180319171027.GA84127@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1803200810380.66427@mail.fig.ol.no> <20180320094625.GA24463@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1803201232590.66427@mail.fig.ol.no> <20180321061231.GA73086@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1803210830250.66427@mail.fig.ol.no> <20180322015043.GA16501@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:50+0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Trond Endrestøl wrote: > > > > Why do you need rEFInd at all if your laptop's UEFI environment can > > > choose which OS to boot? > > > > Unless I want to boot the default, I have to hit F12 every time I want > > to boot something else. This is on a Dell Latitude E5530. If I could > > persuade the UEFI boot firmware to always present its menu, I wouldn't > > need rEFInd at all. It's nice to have something that presents me with > > a menu and remembers what I chose the last time and selects that after > > a configureable timeout. It's also nice to have additional means > > readily available should rEFInd implode. > > Trond, thanks for the enlightenment, I think I grasp the idea. Two > more questions if you please: > 1. If I have more than one freebsd-ufs partition, how can I configure > boot1.efi (AKA /EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI) to boot the loader from a > particular partition, not from the first one? I doubt you can without modifying the source code. Such has never been an issue at my end. Maybe someone else will chime in. > 2. Why are /boot/boot1.efi and /EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI (extracted from > boot1.efifat) so different, even different length? They are supposed > to be one and the same file, aren't they? It's done this way to simplify the creation of boot1.efifat which is the image for the 800K FAT filesystem. Have a look at the Makefiles in stand/efi/boot1 in the source tree. -- Trond. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 23 11:13:23 2018 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1E4F60E97 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:13:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17C556E38B for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:13:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w2NBDITK080844 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:13:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id w2NBDIZq080841 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:13:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:13:18 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no> Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: FreeBSD questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Solved. Re: Dualboot and ZFS In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1803231122360.66427@mail.fig.ol.no> Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1803231156300.66427@mail.fig.ol.no> References: <20180131082738.GA46395@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <547e65d16ef16667f61d88463ca73079@roundcube.fjl.org.uk> <20180319025914.GA57490@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <ec1e6976-3385-a66f-5938-ad09abae590f@fechner.net> <20180319171027.GA84127@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1803200810380.66427@mail.fig.ol.no> <20180320094625.GA24463@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1803201232590.66427@mail.fig.ol.no> <20180321061231.GA73086@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1803210830250.66427@mail.fig.ol.no> <20180322015043.GA16501@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1803231122360.66427@mail.fig.ol.no> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (BSF 202 2017-01-01) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:13:23 -0000 On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:33+0100, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > > 1. If I have more than one freebsd-ufs partition, how can I configure > > boot1.efi (AKA /EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI) to boot the loader from a > > particular partition, not from the first one? > > I doubt you can without modifying the source code. Such has never been > an issue at my end. Maybe someone else will chime in. This is from uefi(8) on fairly recent stable/11: 2. boot1.efi reads boot configuration from /boot.config or /boot/config. Unlike other first-stage boot loaders, boot1.efi passes the configuration to the next stage boot loader and does not itself act on the contents of the file. 3. boot1.efi searches partitions of type freebsd-ufs and freebsd-zfs for loader.efi. The search begins with partitions on the device from which boot1.efi was loaded, and continues with other available partitions. If both freebsd-ufs and freebsd-zfs partitions exist on the same device the freebsd-zfs partition is preferred. boot1.efi then loads and executes loader.efi. Apparently, there are some options. Using /boot.config or /boot/config on the ESP. Using /boot/loader.conf whereever /boot/loader.efi resides. Relocating loader.efi to wanted the UFS partition. Note the preference towards ZFS when both are present. I don't have any experience using either option. -- Trond. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 23 14:00:52 2018 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09CAF6EB4B for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:00:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from as@cmplx.uk) Received: from jail0199.vps.exonetric.net (jail0199.vps.exonetric.net [IPv6:2a02:1658:1::199:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "jail0199.vps.exonetric.net", Issuer "jail0199.vps.exonetric.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36AE4754C8 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:00:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from as@cmplx.uk) Received: from jail0199.vps.exonetric.net (jail0199.vps.exonetric.net [178.250.76.108]) by jail0199.vps.exonetric.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w2NE0pt5086727 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:00:51 GMT (envelope-from as@jail0199.vps.exonetric.net) Received: (from as@localhost) by jail0199.vps.exonetric.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w2NE0oHR086725 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:00:50 GMT (envelope-from as) Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:00:50 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht <as@cmplx.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: WORKAROUND: Re: texlive missing fonts? Message-ID: <20180323140050.GA86055@jail0199.vps.exonetric.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:00:52 -0000 Answering my own question, in case it might help others: On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 04:39:10PM +0000, as wrote: > I'm seeing lots of missed fonts: > > 20474701626e> cat missfont.log > mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 600 --mag 0+420/600 --dpi 420 t1-zi4r-4 > mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 600 --mag 0+540/600 --dpi 540 t1-zi4r-4 > mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 600 --mag 0+438/600 --dpi 438 txsy > mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 600 --mag 0+540/600 --dpi 540 rtxr > mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 600 --mag 0+540/600 --dpi 540 txex > mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 600 --mag 0+438/600 --dpi 438 rtxr > mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 600 --mag 0+540/600 --dpi 540 t1-zi4b-4 > mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 600 --mag 0+540/600 --dpi 540 rtxmi > mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 600 --mag 0+540/600 --dpi 540 txsy > mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 600 --mag 0+540/600 --dpi 540 txsyc > mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 600 --mag 0+540/600 --dpi 540 txsyb > mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 600 --mag 0+540/600 --dpi 540 txsya > > (This is from a conference template which uses lots of fonts) > > I see that all these are in fact installed by > texlive-texmf, e.g. > > # pkg info -xl texlive-texmf|grep t1-zi4r-4 > /usr/local/share/texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/public/inconsolata/ot1-zi4r-4.tfm > /usr/local/share/texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/public/inconsolata/t1-zi4r-4.tfm > # pkg info -xl texlive-texmf|grep t1-zi4b-4 > /usr/local/share/texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/public/inconsolata/ot1-zi4b-4.tfm > /usr/local/share/texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/public/inconsolata/t1-zi4b-4.tfm > > and so on. > > I tried to run updmap-sys: > > # updmap-sys --enable Map inconsolata.map > updmap will read the following updmap.cfg files (in precedence order): > /usr/local/share/texmf-config/web2c/updmap.cfg > updmap may write changes to the following updmap.cfg file: > /usr/local/share/texmf-config/web2c/updmap.cfg > dvips output dir: "/usr/local/share/texmf-var/fonts/map/dvips/updmap" > pdftex output dir: "/usr/local/share/texmf-var/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap" > dvipdfmx output dir: "/usr/local/share/texmf-var/fonts/map/dvipdfmx/updmap" > updmap [ERROR]: The following map file(s) couldn't be found: > updmap [ERROR]: inconsolata.map (in /usr/local/share/texmf-config/web2c/updmap.cfg) > updmap [ERROR]: Did you run mktexlsr? > > You can disable non-existent map entries using the option > --syncwithtrees. > > # > > # updmap-sys --listmaps > updmap will read the following updmap.cfg files (in precedence order): > /usr/local/share/texmf-config/web2c/updmap.cfg > updmap may write changes to the following updmap.cfg file: > /usr/local/share/texmf-config/web2c/updmap.cfg > Map zi4.map enabled in /usr/local/share/texmf-config/web2c/updmap.cfg > Map newtx.map enabled in /usr/local/share/texmf-config/web2c/updmap.cfg > Map libertine.map enabled in /usr/local/share/texmf-config/web2c/updmap.cfg > Map txfonts.map enabled in /usr/local/share/texmf-config/web2c/updmap.cfg > Map inconsolata.map enabled in /usr/local/share/texmf-config/web2c/updmap.cfg > # > > > Am I missing some steps? > Or has something gone wrong in my installation? After another round of searching online, I repeatedly met advice to rm ~/.texlive2015. I found that I have this directory on my account, and also on root, i.e. /root/.texlive2015. I deleted both these directories, and then run updmap-sys mktexlsr and now all seems fine, all fonts are found. Probably I had some outdated data in one or both of these directories. However, I still have these maps, added with updmap-sys --enable Map <mapname>.map # cat /usr/local/share/texmf-config/web2c/updmap.cfg Map libertine.map Map newtx.map Map txfonts.map Map zi4.map # If try to remove these maps from /usr/local/share/texmf-config/web2c/updmap.cfg I still get missing font errors. I guess since all these fonts are installed by print/texlive-texmf, something must be wrong in the configuration, i.e. in registering these map files. So, while this is a workaround, I'm not sure this is a solution. Thanks Anton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.21.1803231122360.66427>