From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 16 18:05:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9DE106566B for ; Sat, 16 May 2009 18:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7EA68FC19 for ; Sat, 16 May 2009 18:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (adsl-19-244-249.bna.bellsouth.net [68.19.244.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4GI4wHD057009 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 16 May 2009 14:05:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: Romain =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tarti=E8re?= In-Reply-To: <20090516173246.GA76116@blogreen.org> References: <20090516173246.GA76116@blogreen.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-b+Sndp3YKlUkkLVlYOqT" Organization: FreeBSD Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 13:04:13 -0500 Message-Id: <1242497053.5638.70.camel@balrog.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: How to stay up-to-date with Nouveau? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 18:05:11 -0000 --=-b+Sndp3YKlUkkLVlYOqT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 19:32 +0200, Romain Tarti=E8re wrote: > Hi! >=20 > I am happily using Nouveau from a while now and have always updated my > ports according to the following scheme: > 1. Update the system "as usual"; > 2. Update and install drm from git; > 3. Update and install xf86-video-nouveau from git. >=20 > I have been doing this since I have patched my src tree (I continued to > update my system using subversion so the patches are still merged in > it). >=20 >=20 > However, I can see ports update for xf86-video-nouveau so I am wondering > if I could just continue to use drm and xf86-video-nouveau from the > ports instead of the ones in git? I think that patches in the system are > still required, are they? You still need my kernel patch until it eventually gets committed. The current libdrm and xf86-video-nouveau ports should be fine now though. robert. >=20 > Thank you! > Romain --=20 Robert Noland FreeBSD --=-b+Sndp3YKlUkkLVlYOqT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkoPAB0ACgkQM4TrQ4qfROPqfACeM33g1DoBqFEWwgQztz38vWtq pV0AnRTVrsjDWTTdc+Gy5t4Gf6pwEdEl =OWrb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-b+Sndp3YKlUkkLVlYOqT--