From owner-freebsd-newbies Wed May 19 11: 5: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Received: from kalypso.cybercom.net (kalypso.cybercom.net [209.21.136.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205CF1558A for ; Wed, 19 May 1999 11:05:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ksmm@threespace.com) Received: from localhost (ksmm@localhost) by kalypso.cybercom.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id OAA27010; Wed, 19 May 1999 14:05:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 14:04:39 -0400 (EDT) From: The Classiest Man Alive X-Sender: ksmm@kalypso.cybercom.net To: Jukka Simila Cc: newbies@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Installing 2 OS's on seperate drives? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Interestingly enough, I don't think Windows 98 suffers from that same problem. I have a setup where Windows NT and Windows 98 share a drive (in that order), and Windows 98 is able to boot even though it doesn't use the first partition on the first drive. I do believe 95 has problems starting on the second disk/partition though. K.S. On Wed, 19 May 1999, Jukka Simila wrote: : Yes, but I believe Windows has to be on the first drive, I'm not : absolutely sure but I have a feeling that when I some time ago did that : kind of install, windows didn't boot if it weren't the first. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message