From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 19 07:03:25 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA08923 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 19 Mar 1995 07:03:25 -0800 Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id HAA08915; Sun, 19 Mar 1995 07:03:12 -0800 Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA12088 (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Sun, 19 Mar 1995 08:32:55 -0600 Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA24873; 19 Mar 95 08:03:06 CST (Sun) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id IAA24867; Sun, 19 Mar 1995 08:03:05 -0600 Message-Id: <199503191403.IAA24867@bonkers.taronga.com> X-Authentication-Warning: bonkers.taronga.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: phk@ref.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp), nate@sneezy.sri.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org, core@FreeBSD.org, peter@bonkers.taronga.com Subject: Re: NMI Error success story In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 19 Mar 95 00:19:40 PST." <199503190819.AAA22929@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.4.1 7/21/94 Date: Sun, 19 Mar 1995 08:02:42 -0600 From: Peter da Silva Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > Humm.. 3+1+1+1 = 6, 3+2+2+2=9, should have been 30% faster if everything > > > hit the cache, figure an actual cache hit rate of 80% and you should have > > > seen a 24% performance increase by this. > > Well, 10% is what I saw on "make world"... > We must be missing the cache a lot more than I figured on. Um, getting a 10% improvement on "make world" which is dependent on so much more than CPU speed alone from a 24% improvement in CPU speed isn't such a small thing.