From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jun 11 7:56: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAF837B404 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 07:56:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (orb_rules@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5BEtxS2034811; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:55:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g5BEtxxP034810; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:55:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:55:59 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop To: Pete French Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: code freeze Message-ID: <20020611165559.A34669@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FCuugMFkClbJLl1L" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from pfrench@firstcallgroup.co.uk on Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 03:47:40PM +0100 X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 03:47:40PM +0100, Pete French wrote: > One again, for the slow witted, what tag do I need to use for the > *port* tree to get the 4.6 release version of the ports ? I tried > the one suggested in the previos email (which I now do not have to hand > unfortunately) and that cheerfully started deleting all my ports. Subsequ= ent > perusal of the documentation reveals a lot of possible tags for the souur= ce, > but scant information as to the correct tag for the ports. All the varian= ts > I have tried seem to result in wholesale deletion of ports, and I have fo= und > several places where I am told that the only correct tag is '.' You can always use cvs to checkout the ports tree with tag RELEASE_4_6_0, although I also thought that cvsupping with that same tag would work. The ports are indeed already tagged according to http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Makefile?only_with_tag=3DRELEAS= E_4_6_0 But just one quick question: why do you really need the *exact* ports tree = for 4.6? I'd think the current ports tree is better - ports get upgraded all the time, there's nothing special about the ports tree at the tagging moment. HTH, --Stijn --=20 The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their vi= ews =2E.. which can be very uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts = that needs altering. -- Doctor Who, "Face of Evil" --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9Bg9+Y3r/tLQmfWcRAg+RAJ0c8d5j9WMH7B48nWVY4L8czSi1GACeJG44 aLDfjwcEk49Apr9aNWj48dI= =rfb3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message