From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 30 00:34:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D215116A556; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:34:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C377A43D1D; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:34:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2U8Y8gd075291; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:34:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.3/Submit) id i2U8Y8GY075290; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:34:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:34:08 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Hartmut Brandt Message-ID: <20040330003408.A75276@xorpc.icir.org> References: <20040329163926.A38109@xorpc.icir.org> <20040330005013.GA53546@ns1.xcllnt.net> <20040329230643.B70930@xorpc.icir.org> <20040329234212.A72990@xorpc.icir.org> <20040330080250.GA69610@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <40692D02.5090700@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <40692D02.5090700@freebsd.org>; from harti@freebsd.org on Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 10:17:06AM +0200 cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Marcel Moolenaar Subject: Re: proposed bsdlabel patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:34:09 -0000 On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 10:17:06AM +0200, Hartmut Brandt wrote: > Marcel Moolenaar wrote: ... > > The file takes precedence, because any filename that does not contain > > any directory elements is assumed to live in the current directory. The > > shorthand for device special files is secundairy to that, because it's > > a convenience only. If the device special file is meant, it has to be > > specified as /dev/ad0 in the example given. it may be secondary, but it has been the historical behaviour for ages and I don't want to hear people rightly screaming for a change that broke a huge number of existing scripts. > That makes it very easy to trash a file in the current directory. that is a minor concern. "rm" has the same problem :) cheers luigi