From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 1 16:11:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA11348 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 1 May 1998 16:11:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [195.1.171.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA11324 for ; Fri, 1 May 1998 16:11:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) From: sthaug@nethelp.no Received: (qmail 22939 invoked by uid 1001); 1 May 1998 23:11:11 +0000 (GMT) To: michaelh@cet.co.jp Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patches to recognize 440BX chipset In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 2 May 1998 07:54:47 +0900 (JST)" References: X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.28.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 02 May 1998 01:11:11 +0200 Message-ID: <22937.894064271@verdi.nethelp.no> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > 46 minutes. This is with: > > Hoo ha! Smoked the 60 minute barrier. I gotta have one of these! Yup, I'd like to have one myself :-) (I don't own the machine I'm running these tests on). My guess is you could improve a bit on this time with faster disks (eg. Cheetahs). But given fairly inexpensive 5400 RPM disks, I have to say I'm quite happy. I also tried using MFS instead of -pipe. Got almost exactly the same time (MFS about 20 seconds slower, which is really not significant). Other things which would be interesting to try are soft updates, and the new CAM code. Maybe tomorrow... Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message