From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 14 06:34:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE2816A4CE; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 06:34:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from toxic.magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948B843D55; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 06:34:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adamw@magnesium.net) Received: by toxic.magnesium.net (Postfix, from userid 1252) id 6A6AADA8EE; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:34:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 01:34:57 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger To: Mikhail Teterin Message-ID: <20050314063457.GD36011@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <20050314054808.GB36011@toxic.magnesium.net> <200503140621.j2E6LOXV061689@corbulon.video-collage.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200503140621.j2E6LOXV061689@corbulon.video-collage.com> X-Editor: Vim 6.3 http://www.vim.org X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5 http://www.mutt.org X-PGP-Key: http://www.vectors.cx/pgp.key.txt X-URL: http://www.vectors.cx X-ASL: 6/m/behind you User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: intrusive PORTREVISION bumping X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 06:34:57 -0000 >> (03.14.2005 @ 0121 PST): Mikhail Teterin said, in 0.7K: << > > Complaining to us won't help, because we will be following the exact > > same procedure for the next release. Your best bet would be to try to > > convince the openoffice team to read emails and PRs from time to time. > > Well, you will, I hope, exclude editors/oodict-all next time. > */openoffice-templates should, probably, be left alone too. No, we won't. We will send out an email next time. And if the openoffice team doesn't respond, ooodict-all will get its PORTREVISION bumped. > > That being said, if you can think of a better deployment plan for new > > glib20 library versions, please let us know! > > I think, going through binaries (executables and libraries) installed by > each "nominated" port with ldd ought to do it. > > Most of the ports are available as pre-built packages, fetching and > examining them can be automated. Be my guest. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx