Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:41:00 +0200 From: Nikolaj Thygesen <mailinglist@diamondbox.dk> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Commiting new ports Message-ID: <4849143C.4080706@diamondbox.dk> In-Reply-To: <20080606041113.GB55367@shepherd> References: <48486F30.1000603@diamondbox.dk> <20080605234013.GB54936@atarininja.org> <20080606041113.GB55367@shepherd>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sahil Tandon wrote: > Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > >> On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 12:56:48AM +0200, Nikolaj Thygesen wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I hope this is the right list to ask this question. I recently >>> commited a new port, and received two messages from "ports." The first >>> one noted that a person had assigned the port to himself, and the second >>> mail simply stated that the PR went from "open" to "closed" due to >>> "feedback timeout." I reckon this means the port was rejected, but have >>> no clue for what reason. Was I supposed to supply any kind of feedback >>> somewhere?? >>> >> I would suggest following up with the person who closed the PR (which I >> assume was the same person it was assigned to). There is a good chance >> the feedback request was not seen by you for any number of reasons. >> Lastly, the feedback being requested should also be in the audit-trail >> of the PR if possible, so you may be able to look there if you have not >> already. >> >> Without more information I'm afraid we can't help you further. We would >> need, at a minimum, the PR number to follow up. >> > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/123239 > > Perhaps Martin sought feedback from Nikolaj via email and did not receive a > reply. > > As previously reported the port was closed due to a mail bounce, and it has been reopened, so all is well! Thanks - Nikolaj
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4849143C.4080706>