From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 11 16:54:04 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id QAA14779 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 11 Jan 1995 16:54:04 -0800 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA14771 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 1995 16:54:02 -0800 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.8/jtpda-5.0) with SMTP id BAA27108 ; Thu, 12 Jan 1995 01:54:50 +0100 Received: by blaise.ibp.fr (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA17547; Thu, 12 Jan 95 01:54:56 +0100 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier ROBERT) Message-Id: <9501120054.AA17547@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: Meaning of maxfiles To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 1995 01:54:55 +0100 (MET) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199501120019.LAA23982@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Jan 12, 95 11:19:17 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23beta2] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 462 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > For now, just increase it in param.c. This will also allow processes > to increase their current rlimit for the number of open files to too > large a value, but most processes don't increase it so there are > unlikely to be problems. That's what I did but it's pretty ugly... I don't think it's the right fix. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.1.0-Development #2: Sat Jan 7 00:55:25 MET 1995