From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Feb 16 12:03:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA11156 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 12:03:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA11077 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 12:03:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA10657; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 11:28:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 11:28:21 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: Mark Castillo cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SOCKS or NAT In-Reply-To: <004f01bd38cd$90774a70$c800a8c0@phineas> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 13 Feb 1998, Mark Castillo wrote: > I am planning on installing a small network of about 3-5 pc's. One will be > FreeBSD connected to ASDL and local ethernet (192.168.0.x). We will only be > using outbound www, ftp, and email, and possibly use ICQ. Is it easier to > use a SOCKS server (with socksified clients) or "natd"? > natd by a long shot. SOCKS requres SOCKSified clients. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message