From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 1 20:22:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A03E3AC7; Thu, 1 May 2014 20:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.bitblocks.com (ns1.bitblocks.com [173.228.5.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DF6186B; Thu, 1 May 2014 20:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bitblocks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6299FB82A; Thu, 1 May 2014 13:22:09 -0700 (PDT) To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: Beaglebone black network performance In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 01 May 2014 12:45:15 PDT." References: <20140501184925.1EDBCB827@mail.bitblocks.com> Comments: In-reply-to Adrian Chadd message dated "Thu, 01 May 2014 12:45:15 -0700." Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 13:22:09 -0700 From: Bakul Shah Message-Id: <20140501202209.6299FB82A@mail.bitblocks.com> Cc: Bakul Shah , freebsd-arm X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 20:22:10 -0000 On Thu, 01 May 2014 12:45:15 PDT Adrian Chadd wrote: > Does plan9 on the rpi use interrupts and DMA, or just polling? Both interrupts and DMA. The code is relatively easy to read. http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sources/plan9/sys/src/9/bcm/