From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat Jun 29 20:50:22 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66DB15C0926; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 20:50:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 593F78A05D; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 20:50:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (etoilebsd.net [178.32.217.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAA7A778; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 20:50:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.103] (91-166-102-26.subs.proxad.net [91.166.102.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 368C3B87EA; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 22:50:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 22:50:17 +0200 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <201906192240.x5JMequU017187@repo.freebsd.org> <20190628070305.eim4o3d77iyti5d5@ivaldir.net> <20190629160445.051f2426@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: svn commit: r504590 - in head/net: samba46 samba47 samba48 To: "Timur I. Bakeyev" ,Tijl Coosemans CC: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org From: Baptiste Daroussin Message-ID: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 593F78A05D X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.97 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.974,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 20:50:22 -0000 Le 29 juin 2019 20:40:53 GMT+02:00, "Timur I=2E Bakeyev" = a =C3=A9crit : >Tonight I hope to commit 4=2E10 port=2E It does not solve rhe pb, staying on the legacy libs is the solution, as I= said even fedora is on the legacy Best regards, Bapt > >On Sat, Jun 29, 2019, 16:06 T=C4=B3l Coosemans wrote= : > >> On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 09:03:05 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin > >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:40:52PM +0000, Timur I=2E Bakeyev wrote: >> >> Author: timur >> >> Date: Wed Jun 19 22:40:52 2019 >> >> New Revision: 504590 >> >> URL: https://svnweb=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/changeset/ports/504590 >> >> >> >> Log: >> >> Make legacy ports use legacy libs=2E >> > >> > Given samba48 is the default, that means now no users can have both >> samba and >> > notmuch or freeradius together=2E >> > >> > Even Fedora who usually lives on the edge in this area, while they >have >> samba >> > 4=2E10 they are still using talloc 2=2E1=2E6 (probably for the reason= of >the >> conflicts >> > and waiting for other consumers of talloc to be able to build >natively >> on 2=2E2) >> > >> > This has broken the upgrade of the desktops of many people I know >who >> are using >> > neomutt :( >> > >> > and also a couple of server setup=2E Please reconsider this choice=2E >> >> With 2019Q3 branch in two days and 11=2E3 about to be released it's >> probably best to move all consumers to the legacy libs=2E >>