From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 01:04:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200CE16A4CE for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 01:04:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6A743D1F for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 01:04:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pergesu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so843012wri for ; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 17:04:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tN0+/8QibfERHBHYhwk0aKcITX9C/wZjqA7MtStQA48WJFFwuS6025aRn5hbKqdcL/3J/3dMPxtS0gfBDtmAfLdOkOhjFUXs+RdJnUivE9qqwZmhMN76EQ0aixJe7fPGoaV0+9vYd6WC5DWFBot78Badpm9sXYkngsWUj7752pQ= Received: by 10.54.63.8 with SMTP id l8mr80414wra; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 17:04:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.42.28 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 17:04:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <810a540e05030417046fe6b101@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:04:10 -0700 From: Pat Maddox To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Running vsftpd standalone vs inetd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pat Maddox List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 01:04:11 -0000 Is it better to run vsftpd standalone or using inetd? A friend of mine told me that it's more secure to do it standalone, and apparently that's the recommended method now. If that's the case, how do I go about getting vsftpd to run when the machine boots up? It doesn't look like there's a vsftpd_enable that I can use, like I can with other services.