From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 13 16:51:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9002316A4CF for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:51:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3178743D4C for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:51:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1112.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 66D771C0009F for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:51:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1112.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 486491C0009A for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:51:04 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050213165104296.486491C0009A@mwinf1112.wanadoo.fr Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:51:04 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <973616252.20050213175104@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050213162308.GA95890@lucky.net> References: <20050213145302.14A9E4BDAA@ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com> <1736042877.20050213155911@wanadoo.fr> <420F6BAF.8060304@makeworld.com> <1374659210.20050213161054@wanadoo.fr> <420F6ED9.8010301@makeworld.com> <285864121.20050213161830@wanadoo.fr> <420F70C5.60006@makeworld.com> <854574739.20050213163818@wanadoo.fr> <20050213162308.GA95890@lucky.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: WEIRD: telnet X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:51:05 -0000 Valentin Nechayev writes: > If I show screenshot with ssh'ing to port 443, will it be convincing? Yes. I'd like to see how it's done, if it can be done, although I'm still now sure how it would be useful. But I'd rather see it used to connect to ports like 25 or 80. > Not current telnet, because it interprets 0xFF in wrong way. See bin/52032 I dunno. Works for me. Of course, all I ever do with it is check to see if sendmail or my Web server is answering, so it's not a long exchange. -- Anthony