Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 23:54:00 +0400 From: Stas Yakovlev <stas.yakovlev@gmail.com> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Suggestion] update net/libnet & net/libnet-devel Message-ID: <e7cb17ff05080312547172b170@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20050802143511.1715a7d9@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> References: <e7cb17ff0507281436386513b@mail.gmail.com> <20050729174226.5af92f7d@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> <e7cb17ff050729230528382c23@mail.gmail.com> <20050730110729.0f5a2d21@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> <e7cb17ff05080201193d36467d@mail.gmail.com> <20050802143511.1715a7d9@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/08/05, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi All.
> > > > > > I think it's time to update net/libnet & net/libnet-devel
> > > > .......
> > Thank you for usefull discussion.
> >
> > >You should send 3 PR
> >
> > >The first PR: [repocopy] net/libnet -> net/libnet10
> > >The second PR: [PATCH] net/libnet: Update to 1.1.2.1
> > >The third PR: [PATCH] net/libnet-devel: Update to 1.1.3
> >
> > I don't send PR because I think it's not the best solution.
>=20
> May I inquire what does it make you think the way advertised by all our
> docs (and post on this lists) is not the best solution ?
Sorry, I was wrong.
> Try this:
> BUILD_DEPENDS=3D libnet>=3D1.0.2a,1:${PORTSDIR}/net/libnet
> etc.
Looking good.
But the bsd.port.mk says that its format
BUILD_DEPENDS=3D <path>:<dir>:<target>
May be I missing something.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e7cb17ff05080312547172b170>