From owner-freebsd-security Thu Jul 27 15:49:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from dt052n3e.san.rr.com (dt052n3e.san.rr.com [204.210.33.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA7D37C10E; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 15:49:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt052n3e.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA98114; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 15:49:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Message-ID: <3980BC6F.265136D2@gorean.org> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 15:49:19 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Watson Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, ogud@tislabs.com Subject: Re: MFC'ing OpenSSL 0.9.5a? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Robert Watson wrote: > > A co-worker of mine pointed out that FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE shipped with > OpenSSL 0.9.4, which apparently causes problems for BIND9 due to API > changes between versions, and bugs in 0.9.4. FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT appears > to be using OpenSSL 0.9.5a; I was wondering if there were any plans to MFC > the new version of OpenSSL? Of course there are. Kris has already stated that he would be doing this as soon as some of the nebulous issues involving the upgrade have been solved in -current. Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message