From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 19 15:03:58 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E002106564A;
	Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:03:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7A78FC0C;
	Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:03:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8JF3vK2098798;
	Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:03:57 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from bapt@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p8JF3vKr098796;
	Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:03:57 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to
	bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:03:53 +0200
From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To: office@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20110919150353.GB90102@azathoth.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: maho@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Any reason to keep OpenOffice.org 2 in the tree?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD <freebsd-office.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-office>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-office>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-office@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-office>,
	<mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:03:58 -0000


--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

This is an open question, in particular direction of maho@ :)

Do we really need to keep OpenOffice.org 2.* in the ports tree?

According to:
http://www.freshports.org/vuxml.php?vid=c97d7a37-2233-11df-96dd-001b2134ef46|f2b43905-3545-11e0-8e81-0022190034c0
it is vulnerable, and I'm not sure we still have users for OpenOffice.org 2.x.
But I may be wrong

Any opinion?

regards,
Bapt

--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk53WdkACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyTBQCgpKcGOo+jSMehRzL+DnGSA4yf
X/AAnRl7TDVIR8QzhCVLmk7ZvmL8BKzS
=BT6b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f--