From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 3 18:15:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664631065670 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:15:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE54B8FC18 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id h3so681153nfh.33 for ; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:15:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=FKgqIAtUA6JbSekDrCf8+dzsfv1FXaJF5mIgqdR0fbw=; b=l8C03hmfrYxMg5o2cz3nR4i73rqNKj8l/SvKwW5rnU89Qx0UcAv6ZtpCfswajB8YWa1A4K+1CZAiTgy31uFqAVC6H/LE5Pvn6dnpbX1rGYgDkSXX3UNq6gGfFQf3L/zOxsTthYDSgoNncnfXpACiTbHj6BzdJILutwwiQ5fAHs8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=WeXo0OoOW/tBuOgVTgxeTYwV11YjKLDuEiIlLH4NnmWyDTjVW3vERPiGFoJyncC6MG7PzxlDMkr5/YfLPze2jADkVO4CO17CgEOR1TOhw1d7/xUCW/VimzQMxhemqtTySKNvdEi7m/0njWj1UlAiWFuVRuDcwZKaHVJMXgcxAww= Received: by 10.86.65.11 with SMTP id n11mr963499fga.64.1212516913992; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:15:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from acme.spoerlein.net ( [217.172.44.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a37sm805114fkc.14.2008.06.03.11.15.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from roadrunner.spoerlein.net (e180153248.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.153.248]) by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m53IF8cp052832 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 3 Jun 2008 20:15:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: from roadrunner.spoerlein.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roadrunner.spoerlein.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m53IF5ie004290 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Jun 2008 20:15:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: (from uqs@localhost) by roadrunner.spoerlein.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m53IF5PL004289; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 20:15:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 20:15:05 +0200 From: Ulrich Spoerlein To: Garance A Drosehn Message-ID: <20080603181505.GF1592@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> Mail-Followup-To: Garance A Drosehn , current@FreeBSD.org References: <20080603164503.GC1592@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Subversion documentation for the FreeBSD project? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:15:18 -0000 On Tue, 03.06.2008 at 13:28:01 -0400, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > At 6:45 PM +0200 6/3/08, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > seems like I totally missed the effort to port the FreeBSD CVS to SVN. > > Is there some documentation around, that describes the New Way for us > > mere mortals? Specific questions that come to my mind: > > > > - How will repository propagation be done in the future? rsync? > > - Is there one big svn tree or src/ ports/ doc/ seperately? > > - Did you fixup the CVS repo-copies into real SVN renames? > > - Will svn(1) ever be part of the base system? > > - Some statistics about repo-size would be nice :) > > It is still a work in progress, and people who do not need commit > access should (for now) not do anything special. All the CVS-based > services should still be working, and it is probably best to continue > to use those for now. It is still possible that we'll hit some > unexpected cases in subversion, and find that we have to switch right > back to CVS. Ok then, no burned bridges yet :) > Please realize that a LOT of work was involved in making this switch > (none of which was done by me... ahem). So we don't mean to dismiss > your request or your interest, but we're just not ready with all the > answers that you would like to see. No problem, I'm not in a hurry and applaud the effort in general. I'm only curious why the "switch" (test?) was/is done in "secret" and no HEADSUP has been sent so far (or did I miss it?) I hope people don't mind me dragging the issue out into the open... Cheers, Ulrich Spoerlein -- It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak, and remove all doubt.