From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 24 21:46:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA08144 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 21:46:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns2.cetlink.net (root@ns2.cetlink.net [209.54.54.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA08094 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 21:46:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jak@cetlink.net) Received: from exit1.i485.net (ts2-cltnc-79.cetlink.net [209.54.58.79]) by ns2.cetlink.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA02991; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 00:45:57 -0500 (EST) From: jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly) To: Tom Cc: Michael.Bielicki@linkdesign.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Token Ring for FreeBSD yet? Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 06:46:22 GMT Message-ID: <34f6bde0.7933531@mail.cetlink.net> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.01/16.397 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id VAA08103 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 24 Feb 1998 21:16:13 -0800 (PST), Tom wrote: > It is not just a driver. The entire IP-over-token ring issue needs to >figured out. I think the Linux folks have already done that, no? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message