From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 2 07:54:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8189F37B401 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 07:54:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail12.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DB643FA3 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 07:54:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 3926 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2003 15:54:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )encrypted SMTP for ; 2 Apr 2003 15:54:58 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h32FsrOv022979; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:54:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3E8AFB2F.3040701@jocose.org> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 10:54:54 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Peter Schultz cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing Sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 15:54:56 -0000 On 02-Apr-2003 Peter Schultz wrote: > I'm sorry for beating a dead horse. A guy and I from tcbug were just > trying to fix his postfix installation, he does not know what happened, > it just stopped working. There would not have been a problem if > sendmail wasn't tied into the system so closely. I'm just hoping core > will say, "submit a working solution and it will be done," so that > there's a little inspiration here. > > Pete... First, core@ is not the appropriate body for that type of request. Both current@ and arch@ are much better targets. Second, is NO_SENDMAIL + the postfix port inadequate? -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/