From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 13 23:04:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00E053E6 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 23:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fr-exchange.activnetworks.com (anwadmin.net8.nerim.net [213.41.185.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8126E1E08 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 23:04:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rn.activnetworks.com ([192.168.1.100]) by fr-exchange.activnetworks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 23:57:45 +0100 Message-ID: <52FD4F6A.5070400@activnetworks.com> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:04:10 +0100 From: Remy Nonnenmacher User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130906 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert Subject: Re: Damaged tar files References: <52FCB056.6030007@activnetworks.com> <44ob2ahhds.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <44ob2ahhds.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Feb 2014 22:57:45.0417 (UTC) FILETIME=[02239B90:01CF290F] Cc: freebsd-stable List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 23:04:14 -0000 On 02/13/14 21:44, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Remy Nonnenmacher writes: > >> Hi there, >> >> While moving big files using tar c | tar x, I found that every time, >> at 30GB sent, the receiving tar outputs a "tar: Damaged tar >> archive". I also checked that a Linux machine also sees a broken >> stream. >> >> It seems that in stable -10 and stable -9, tar creation is broken >> (libarchive update ?). >> >> Have someone seen this before I fill a PR ? > > I can't reproduce it on RELENG_9... > It needs further investigation since conditions are too specific. I guess this is transient I have not enough narrowed. Sorry for the noise. I will be back when I have something and if it needs fix. Thanks (oo)