From nobody Tue Oct 26 17:03:42 2021 X-Original-To: ruby@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8361835338 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 17:03:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ldd@rgnets.com) Received: from mail-ua1-x92c.google.com (mail-ua1-x92c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HdypK6KPXz3Pks for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 17:03:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ldd@rgnets.com) Received: by mail-ua1-x92c.google.com with SMTP id v3so2374476uam.10 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:03:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rgnets.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=wjLKdYEa8H7psBL/K0AFStCKtSuAQ1pDuK+Wx1/+4as=; b=d2wV5QmMlpmPqFY0nbbkC+j2h/WYoyamKLIkL0eg4mn5gEZuWWCtBk4EA0Oaa3SYLR i40zX1OC87nHOL72lhpixqTdTiYXtlVLq/ocys9a8/GyQALMpHUjxZcQfhkdflQtyAup IY7p2YYUsQT7Acjk7yvKvxJ+K7IXv9+FJIdeWmY+OzOs8NxXLYilgNAYc2WzjSouzGit 1rW2TxEPVI1NdgTG8lLBhJP1g4rDnNQeyTM0j0IyA/rbyNSIgprkhbhbx+xd+Rr+kNLp Sj/oTmKzc2z7JaX7R1j244lmxMhsY9ESD7qhbUhQh+CAmqpnvB3kxlXGBxCu/6YdWVgH 3avg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=wjLKdYEa8H7psBL/K0AFStCKtSuAQ1pDuK+Wx1/+4as=; b=uusKQu0k1gZsOYrgbjRfVurBRf+479+uwFefM0YYhlmKgYWqWlfIGQ22exrk9vhas4 FneFuEhjxCkfHI2tPWkVaD9Yjt+ofGtyPafLFvlD28mbx4DbkdZkElAJzBmCptZbcuAa h2KtbLDgSXh5+Nq4LJbO5Kx5fKj1RWZAYSKaShfhstv24htJZAzNwvykrE0wqh2R9VqP LS9MWYdikU0AiuPVp7o2whjpCPOVUroJzDSk/3huLThXw+ngavmt6ulE7m/fXVEGpBKs UgtqXnu1MSpTyMWsArO7d8OQoBwL22A4HStLujgu3zVQ22/OZaRkTaDN/hfbahzbpATQ 5xYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531tcsUOCXx1082BWNLkBj1lg5Pynvkjqo6PkRXaDR7G56KbBidC K8HiMjL4GASL0TZVlP1Omrh3bL/FQmKBy2wcezIPQsS4jQMdKNzUr/y/O/CYGaDY4pp/Kr+QAI7 aq47Ujddll7Oo0bb6lSLxLcY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx4sD+vr4z1yRS3/Q2w7lQCTmomilS6ymyzrHNMk6qtLNQTqupXD1GoyoZDfu43IfLgaWb0f6R8MG25NOKPMIY= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:5542:: with SMTP id u2mr24858780uaa.62.1635267833096; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:03:53 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ruby List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Lannar Dean Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 13:03:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: request to update rubygems package To: ruby@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004dfd9a05cf4476fa" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HdypK6KPXz3Pks X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=rgnets.com header.s=google header.b=d2wV5QmM; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ldd@rgnets.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::92c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ldd@rgnets.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.53 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.59)[-0.593]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[rgnets.com:s=google]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ruby@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[rgnets.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[rgnets.com:+]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.74)[0.739]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::92c:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.18)[-0.176]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --0000000000004dfd9a05cf4476fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, I was wondering if there is a reason that the latest version of ruby-gems (i'm using ruby27-gems) appears to be somewhat outdated on the latest quarterly branch. I was noticing a deprecation warning when running bundle install, and discussed with the rubygems maintainers here: https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/issues/4283 Their response was > I guess this is fixed by new rubygems (you're using 3.0.8 which is quite > old). The strange thing is that ruby 2.7 should ship with rubygems 3.1.x, > but for some reason ruby on freebsd seems to be shipping an older rubygems. > This explains why only freebsd users have reported this problem. > > Can you reach out to freebsd packagers and ask for a rubygems upgrade and > ideally also a clarification on why they are shipping a rubygems version > older than the one that comes with upstream ruby? > Could you let me know if/when an updated rubygems package is slated to make its way to the freebsd repo? Thanks in advance! -- ** ** **A cheat code for building a more scalable, manageable, profitable, and secure network.** --0000000000004dfd9a05cf4476fa--