Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 03:36:42 -0800 From: Sergei G <sergeig.public@gmail.com> To: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: which label to use in mount? Message-ID: <567A874A.4040702@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOc73CBJaDqOE5ZUJrZ2U_jjM%2B77sTCRO=631U1SsASQ634Fiw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFLLzCMQtupZX651wR35vrJdXY5Ber8qKPd%2B5EX4Dkp4iCv=vg@mail.gmail.com> <5675574E.3060501@gmail.com> <5678FFE8.4070408@gmail.com> <CAOc73CBJaDqOE5ZUJrZ2U_jjM%2B77sTCRO=631U1SsASQ634Fiw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think I was typing -h and -H and did not pay attention. I think some tools use low and some upper case for human readable form. On 12/22/15 1:14 PM, Ben Woods wrote: > On Tuesday, 22 December 2015, Sergei G <sergeig.public@gmail.com > <mailto:sergeig.public@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I think I just found the reason for different reported numbers: > > df -h > /dev/gpt/dback 48G 2.6G 42G 6% > /backup > > vs > > df -H > /dev/gpt/dback 52G 2.8G 45G 6% > /backup > > > Nice - that old trick! > > So do you think you were sometimes typing -h and other times typing > -H? Or do you think there is a bug that df reports with different base > 1000/1024 for gpt vs ufs labels? > > Regards, > Ben > > > -- > > -- > From: Benjamin Woods > woodsb02@gmail.com <mailto:woodsb02@gmail.com>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?567A874A.4040702>