From owner-freebsd-arch  Wed Jun 21 18:42:10 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from assaris.sics.se (assaris.sics.se [193.10.66.234])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6029137B6E9; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 18:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from assar@assaris.sics.se)
Received: (from assar@localhost)
	by assaris.sics.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA04710;
	Thu, 22 Jun 2000 03:42:24 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from assar)
To: Nik Clayton <nik@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, papowell@astart.com
Subject: Re: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD?
References: <20000621221636.A4137@kilt.nothing-going-on.org>
From: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>
Date: 22 Jun 2000 03:42:23 +0200
In-Reply-To: Nik Clayton's message of "Wed, 21 Jun 2000 22:16:38 +0000"
Message-ID: <5laegesd8g.fsf@assaris.sics.se>
Lines: 12
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070098 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Nik Clayton <nik@FreeBSD.ORG> writes:
> Patrick wants feedback on whether or not FreeBSD would be interested in
> adopting LPRng as our official LPR implementation, (src/contrib/lprng, 
> presumably).  I said I'd raise the issue on -arch, and then, not being much 
> of a printer maven, step back while everyone talks the issue back and forth.

I think this would be a good thing.

And I can't see why anyone should object to adding code distributed
under the Artistic license to FreeBSD either.

/assar


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message