Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 16:45:34 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pf@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237973] pf: implement egress keyword to simplify rules across different hardware Message-ID: <bug-237973-16861-NPUg4vGjcN@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237973-16861@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237973-16861@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237973 --- Comment #7 from Kristof Provost <kp@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to tech-lists from comment #5) No, that's a bad idea. The PR currently correctly reflects the state of the feature request. That = is, it's been requested but has not been implemented and is not currently on the list of items I plan to work on. It also contains useful pointers for someone who wants to work on it. If we close this all that will happen is that someone else will come along = with the same feature request, who will open a new ticket, without any of the us= eful information in this one. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237973-16861-NPUg4vGjcN>