From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 28 18:11:22 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA29300 for current-outgoing; Thu, 28 Mar 1996 18:11:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from meter.eng.uci.edu (root@meter.eng.uci.edu [128.200.85.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA29295 Thu, 28 Mar 1996 18:11:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from newport.ece.uci.edu by meter.eng.uci.edu (8.7.4) id SAA13247; Thu, 28 Mar 1996 18:11:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost by newport.ece.uci.edu (8.7.4) id SAA06536; Thu, 28 Mar 1996 18:11:14 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199603290211.SAA06536@newport.ece.uci.edu> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: rich@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: We need to do another XFree86 release for -current someday soon.. In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 28 Mar 1996 12:33:20 PST." <26399.828045200@time.cdrom.com> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 18:11:13 -0800 From: Steven Wallace Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The problem is simple: xf86config (and much of the rest of X) is still > looking for libc.so.2.2, among perhaps other things. We've still no Yeah, that's one reason why I hate bumping the major version. Why do ns_addr() and iso_addr() have to go? What's the big deal? Anyways, a quick fix to get X working, etc, is to do: ln -s /usr/lib/libc.so.3.0 /usr/lib/libc.so.2.3 which is what I did and all my apps run fine. I am enjoying my memory savings too. Memory is expensive :) Steven