From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Nov 21 23:30:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mail5.speakeasy.net (mail5.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.205]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91A137B405 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:30:17 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 18606 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2001 07:30:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO laptop.baldwin.cx) ([64.81.54.73]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 Nov 2001 07:30:17 -0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20011122012838.V13393@elvis.mu.org> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:30:16 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin To: Alfred Perlstein Subject: Re: Kernel Thread scheduler Cc: Julian Elischer , arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Steve Kargl Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 22-Nov-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * John Baldwin [011122 01:22] wrote: >> >> Perhaps if 'proc' is put under _KERNEL. Since proc embeds a kse, ksegroup, >> and thread, it can't very easily be defined w/o including those definitions. > >#if defined(_KERNEL) || defined(_REALLY_WANT_PROC) Yes, we already have _REALLY_WANT_PROC. It's called: #include Unfortunately includes lots and lots of other garbage. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message