From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jul 13 11:59:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C33314EE4 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 11:59:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 13 Jul 1999 19:58:34 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 19:58:33 +0100 From: David Malone To: "Brian F. Feldman" Cc: Matthew Dillon , Jason Thorpe , Noriyuki Soda , bright@rush.net, dcs@newsguy.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, jon@oaktree.co.uk, tech-userlevel@netbsd.org Subject: Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Message-ID: <19990713195833.A4167@walton.maths.tcd.ie> References: <199907131813.LAA79534@apollo.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: ; from Brian F. Feldman on Tue, Jul 13, 1999 at 02:47:20PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jul 13, 1999 at 02:47:20PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > But I have a valid point: can we do something better than posting a SIGKILL > to the largest process? I think AIX sends all running processes a magic signal (SIGDANGER?) which indicates that the system is short of resources, and if things don't improve real soon then it sends a SIGKILL. Not that I'd suggest that AIX does things the right way... David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message