Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 13:28:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?HEADS_UP:_15.0-CURRENT,_change_to_bridge(4)_might_bre?= =?UTF-8?Q?ak_some_network_configurati?= =?UTF-8?Q?ons_with_=E2=80=9CInvalid_argument=E2=80=9D?= Message-ID: <7a54f675-3c39-43a7-8e06-f63857c3bf91@redbarn.org> In-Reply-To: <aCsJDjfCNk5pA59c@ragweed.eden.le-fay.org> References: <aCsJDjfCNk5pA59c@ragweed.eden.le-fay.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] If we move all member ifaddrs to the bridge itself, then will arp requests always have to be broadcast on all member interfaces? If so this is intolerable from a security perspective, a complete nonstarter. [-- Attachment #2 --] <html> <head> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"> </head> <body> <span dir="ltr" style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;">If we move all member ifaddrs to the bridge itself, then will arp requests always have to be broadcast on all member interfaces? If so this is intolerable from a security perspective, a complete nonstarter. </span> <br> </body> </html>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7a54f675-3c39-43a7-8e06-f63857c3bf91>