From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 11 00:08:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D653E16A4CE for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 00:08:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yearning.mcc.ac.uk (yearning.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.203.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CEA43D5C for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 00:08:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by yearning.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1DKmTe-0004Wl-UF; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 01:08:30 +0100 Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j3B08UdQ029893; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 01:08:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.13.1/8.12.6/Submit) id j3B08TUU029892; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 01:08:29 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 01:08:29 +0100 From: Jonathon McKitrick To: Lowell Gilbert Message-ID: <20050411000829.GA29762@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20050408133347.GB1809@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <441x9l8gon.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <441x9l8gon.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Common Lisp on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 00:08:32 -0000 On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:51:52AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: : Depends on what you're doing. Other than clisp, the Common Lisp : implementations in ports are pretty much all derived from the same : origin (the CMU implementation), so you might as well just try them : and see what you like; the technical differences shouldn't be that : big. [That's ignoring the "embeddable" one, but I wouldn't recommend : that for learning.] I think I've decided to stick with clisp for now, until I find a reason to change. The REPL seems nicer, for one thing. : Or maybe you should consider Scheme... but that's another holy war. No thanks. I've had enough of those. :-) Say, have you fooled around with any clisp GUI toolkits? jm --