From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 19 11:06:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B964C445; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 11:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 260132224; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 11:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m15so4501716wgh.29 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 04:06:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/8BiYi7yLJZv1Vg4s6fd9c0YBfUeNSx4l8AVPPh6pcc=; b=j0QZyrhYhiaVawUBETC2aPyrUCR0rVMuq1eGzdb/pHB5LHza4Hr1vwxE0vXNQKzf2m VnE5oGRQOSELIIzbomXT9YX/L1jPuQ7ksBArpp/AdFA+7Uni1T2X+JPvVqD2Pxvd4R/a 43tkSAnIwllcD9mZ0QVvqGjFWfKCoWVH0tbcpJfb1+NOJdDYRgwVxS1T40CJcCA9TolK 8U9LrGNpx2exuWExtmcngkvfyfkJqKqbm+05lB5OYzLys14yvVHnnAO/ETzbflKAKCbL lignfxunkm258J7RqhbaczklahDcd34llVIHlBCszcRYpbNIUGK8r6A+RGwFF4rvVfVA E3XA== X-Received: by 10.180.94.5 with SMTP id cy5mr15515158wib.11.1405768015392; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 04:06:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cx5sm21247142wjb.8.2014.07.19.04.06.53 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 19 Jul 2014 04:06:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 13:06:52 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Allan Jude Subject: Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ? Message-ID: <20140719110652.GR28314@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <53C706C9.6090506@com.jkkn.dk> <20140718110645.GN87212@FreeBSD.org> <20140718151255.b3e677d9.gerrit.kuehn@aei.mpg.de> <53C973EA.5090104@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QFliEIXSSz7hGqqc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53C973EA.5090104@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 11:06:57 -0000 --QFliEIXSSz7hGqqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:22:18PM -0400, Allan Jude wrote: > On 2014-07-18 15:07, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > On 18 July 2014 07:34, krad wrote: > >> that is true and I have not problem using man pages, however thats not= the > >> way most of the world work and search engines arent exactly new either= =2E We > >> should be trying to engage more people not less, and part of that is > >> reaching out. > >=20 > > Then do the port and maintain it. > >=20 > > The problem isn't the desire to keep things up to date, it's a lack of > > people who want that _and_ are willing/able to do it _and_ are funded > > somehow. > >=20 > > So, please step up! We'll all love you for it. > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > -a > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > >=20 >=20 > At vBSDCon Bapt@ volunteered to port the newer pf back to FreeBSD, after > spending some hours driving with Henning. I tried and broke pf for month and my changes have been reverted, this is n= ot as simple as it looks like, our code as diverge a lot in some part and we do support things that openbsd does not (vimage). Sync features requires us to be very careful, my priorities went elsewhere since that time, so now I will probably only focus on bringing features I care about, and not the entirely= new pf. So no do not count me as volunteer to maintain pf, I ll probably do some wo= rk but not a full sync. Bapt --QFliEIXSSz7hGqqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlPKUUwACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExNKwCfUC870kutCHGAKJtIZk4IbeMW kAUAn2qSmzTVy9GUlsElafZyvdzcyPHk =gs2Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QFliEIXSSz7hGqqc--